Uso de micofenolato mofetilo fuera de registro en enfermedades inmunomediadas / Off-label use of mycophenolate mofetil in immune-mediated diseases

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a largely used immunosuppressive agent in the prevention of transplant rejection and lupus nephritis. Its use has been extended to other immune-mediated diseases (ID). AIM: To assess the off-label use of MMF, its performance as a glucocorticoid sparing agent, the therapeutic response, and its adverse effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed. One hundred-seven patients aged 58 ± 16 years (83% females) who received MMF for ID in off label uses between 2016 and 2018 were included. The study variables were cause of MMF indication, sex, age, use as a first- or second-line treatment and maintenance dosing. The cumulative doses of glucocorticoids six months before and after MMF indication were compared. RESULTS: MMF was used as a second-line therapy in 66 patients (62%). The mean maintenance dose of MMF was 1,500 ± 540 mg/day. Prednisone cumulative doses were 3,908 ± 2,173 and 1,672 ± 1,083 milligrams six months before and six months after starting MMF, respectively (p < 0.01). Adverse effects were identified in 21 (20%) cases, none of them serious. CONCLUSIONS: Mycophenolate has a favorable response profile as a second line immunosuppressive agent. It is effective as a glucocorticoid sparing drug. The safety profile is also favorable as adverse effects were scanty and mild.

Thromboelastometry assessment of mycophenolate mofetil effect on thrombotic risk in dogs with primary and secondary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia and by Erhlichia canis infection / [Avaliação por tromboelastometria do efeito do micofenolato de mofetila no risco trombótico em cães com anemia hemolítica imunomediada primária e secundária à infecção por Erhlichia canis]

This study aimed to identify, by means of thromboelastometry assessment, altered thrombotic risk in dogs with primary and secondary IMHA by E. canis infection after initiating the immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil. The animals' screening was based on complete blood count (CBC), biochemical and urine tests. Dogs with moderate to severe anemia (hematocrit ≤ 25%) which showed symptoms of immune-mediated hemolysis, such as spherocytosis, positive saline agglutination, bilirubinuria and/or hemoglobinuria, were included. Blood and urine samples were collected at two different moments. The first sample (M1) was collected at the time of diagnosis, when hematocrit was lower or equal to 25% before treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (Accord ®); the second sample (M2) was collected after treatment with mycophenolate mofetil, when hematocrit was greater or equal to 30%. Five out of the twelve animals selected died before the end of the study. No reduction in thrombotic risk was observed in the animals treated with mycophenolate mofetil. The animals that presented hypocoagulation at the time of diagnosis showed the worst prognosis, and their reticulocyte count displayed a better prognostic value than their erythrocytes count at the time of diagnosis.(AU)

O objetivo deste estudo foi esclarecer se há alteração do risco trombótico em cães com anemia hemolítica imunomediada primária e secundária a E.canis, avaliado por meio da tromboelastometria, após início de tratamento com micofenolato de mofetila. A seleção dos animais foi baseada na avaliação de hemograma, exame bioquímico e urinálise. Cães com anemia moderada a severa (hematócrito ≤ 25%), com sinais de hemólise imunomediada, como esferocitose, aglutinação em salina positivo, bilirrubinúria e/ ou hemoglobinúria, foram incluídos. As amostras de sangue e urina foram coletadas em dois momentos diferentes. A primeira amostra (M1) foi coletada no momento do diagnóstico, quando o hematócrito era igual ou inferior a 25%, sem fazer uso do micofenolato de mofetila (Accord®), e o segundo momento (M2), após tratamento com micofenolato de mofetila, quando o hematócrito era igual ou maior que 30%. Doze animais foram selecionados, cinco morreram antes do término do estudo. Não houve diminuição do risco trombótico entre os animais tratados com micofenolato de mofetila; os animais que apresentaram menor coagulabilidade apresentaram pior prognóstico, e a contagem de reticulócitos apresentou melhor valor prognóstico do que a contagem de hemácias no momento do diagnóstico.(AU)

Safety and effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil associated with tacrolimus for liver transplantation immunosuppression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

A combination of immunosuppressants may improve outcomes due to the synergistic effect of their different action mechanisms. Currently, there is no consensus regarding the best immunosuppressive protocol after liver transplantation. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tacrolimus associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients undergoing liver transplantation. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Eight randomized trials were included. The proportion of patients with at least one adverse event related to the immunosuppression scheme with tacrolimus associated with MMF was 39.9%. The tacrolimus with MMF immunosuppression regimen was superior in preventing acute cellular rejection compared with that of tacrolimus alone (risk difference [RD]=-0.11; p =0.001). The tacrolimus plus MMF regimen showed no difference in the risk of adverse events compared to that of tacrolimus alone (RD=0.7; p=0.66) and cyclosporine plus MMF (RD=-0.7; p=0.37). Patients undergoing liver transplantation who received tacrolimus plus MMF had similar adverse events when compared to patients receiving other evaluated immunosuppressive regimens and had a lower risk of acute rejection than those receiving in the monodrug tacrolimus regimen.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the treatment of Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis with nephrotic-range proteinuria in children: a prospective randomized controlled trial / 中国当代儿科杂志

OBJECTIVE@#To study the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus cyclophosphamide (CTX) in the treatment of children with Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN) and nephrotic-range proteinuria.@*METHODS@#A prospective clinical trial was conducted in 68 pediatric patients who were admitted to the Department of Nephrology, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Institute of Pediatrics and who were diagnosed with HSPN and nephrotic-range proteinuria from August 2016 to November 2019. The patients were randomly divided into two groups:MMF treatment (@*RESULTS@#At months 3, 6, and 12 of treatment, there was no significant difference in the complete remission rate and the response rate between the MMF treament and CTX treatment groups (@*CONCLUSIONS@#MMF and CTX have similar efficacy and safety in the treatment of HSPN children with nephrotic-range proteinuria.

Conversion to Mycophenolate Mofetil Monotherapy in Liver Recipients: Calcineurin Inhibitor Levels are Key

Abstract: The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) after liver transplantation is associated with post-transplant nephrotoxicity. Conversion to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy improves renal function, but is related to graft rejection in some recipients. Our aim was to identify variables associated with rejection after conversion to MMF monotherapy. Conversion was attempted in 40 liver transplant recipients. Clinical variables were determined and peripheral mononuclear blood cells were immunophenotyped during a 12-month follow- up. Conversion was classified as successful (SC) if rejection did not occur during the follow-up. MMF conversion was successful with 28 patients (70%) and was associated with higher glomerular filtration rates at the end of study. It also correlated with increased time elapsed since transplantation, low baseline CNI levels (Tacrolimus ≤ 6.5 ng/mL or Cyclosporine ≤ 635 ng/mL) and lower frequency of tacrolimus use. The only clinical variable independently related to SC in multivariate analysis was low baseline CNI levels (p = 0.02, OR: 6.93, 95%, CI: 1.3-29.7). Mean baseline fluorescent intensity of FOXP3+ T cells was significantly higher among recipients with SC. In conclusion, this study suggests that baseline CNI levels can be used to identify recipients with higher probability of SC to MMF monotherapy. Clinicaltrials.gov identification: NCT01321112.

Avaliação da tolerabilidade do micofenolato sódico com revestimento entérico versus micofenolato mofetil em receptores de transplante renal / Evaluation of tolerability of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplantation

ResumoIntrodução:O micofenolato mofetil (MMF), pró-droga do ácido micofenólico (MPA), é um tratamento imunossupressor eficaz na profilaxia da rejeição aguda, mas associado a eventos adversos gastrointestinais. O micofenolato sódico (MPS) com revestimento entérico foi desenvolvido com a intenção de reduzir tais eventos associados ao MPA.Objetivo:Avaliar a tolerabilidade de EC-MPS e MMF em receptores de transplante renal.Métodos:Estudo retrospectivo, multicêntrico, com pacientes submetidos a transplante renal entre 07/01/2004 e 31/07/2007 em 18 centros brasileiros.Resultados:1380 pacientes incluídos, 702 receberam EC-MPS e 678 receberam MMF. A idade média de 42,3 anos, 60% masculino e 62,5% de etnia caucasiana. A incidência de eventos avaliados no desfecho composto de eficácia não foi diferente entre os grupos ao final de 24 meses de acompanhamento (22,9% para EC-MPS versus 19,9% para MMF, p = 0,203). Os pacientes tratados com EC-MPS apresentaram maior incidência de eventos adversos gastrointestinais comparados com os tratados com MMF (57,7% vs. 52,5%). Infecções virais foram mais frequentes no grupo EC-MPS (38,2%) comparado com MMF (32,6%). Não houve diferença nos valores médios tolerados no final do primeiro (1187 ± 344 mg vs. 1209 ± 426 mg, p = 0,294) e segundo ano (1172,3 ± 347mg vs. 1197,4 ± 430,6 mg, p = 0,241) pós-transplante.Conclusão:Não houve diferença estatística na incidência de rejeição aguda, função tardia e eventos gastrointestinais entre os tratamentos. A dose média tolerada de MPA foi semelhante entre os grupos, mas pacientes tratados com MMF foram submetidos a mais reduções de doses e descontinuações do tratamento.

AbstractIntroduction:Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), pro-drug mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppressive effective in the prophylaxis of acute rejection, but associated with gastrointestinal adverse events. Mycophenolate sodium (MPS) with enteric coating was developed with intention of reducing such gastrointestinal adverse events associated with MPA.Objective:To evaluate the tolerability of EC-MPS and MMF in renal transplant recipients.Methods:Retrospective, multicenter study, included 1380 patients who underwent a transplant between 07/01/2004 and 31/07/2007 in 18 Brazilian centers.Results1380 patients enrolled, 702 received EC-MPS and 678 received MMF. The average age of patients was 42.3 years, 60% were male and 62.5% of Caucasian ethnicity. The incidence of events evaluated in the composite endpoint of efficacy was not different between groups at the end of 24 months follow-up (22.9% for EC-MPS to MMF versus19.9%, p = 0.203). Patients treated with EC-MPS had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events compared to those treated with MMF (57.7%vs. 52.5%), but there was no statistical difference between groups. Viral infections were more frequent in the EC-MPS group (38.2%) compared with MMF (32.6%). There was no difference in mean tolerated dose after the first (1187 ± 344vs. 1209 ± 426 mg, p = 0.294) and second year (1172.3 ± 347 mgvs. 1197.4 ± 430.6 mg, p = 0.241) after transplantation.Conclusion:There was no statistical difference in the incidence of acute rejection, delayed graft function and gastrointestinal events among treatments. The average tolerated dose of MPA was similar between groups; however, patients treated with MMF underwent more dose reductions and discontinuations of treatment.

Effects of immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil on renal histology and function in single kidney rats submitted to ischemia and reperfusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate renal histological changes and renal function in single kidney rats submitted to renal ischemia-reperfusion and to immunosuppression with tacrolimus and mycophenolate-mofetil. METHODS: Experimental study with 80 Wistar rats distributed into control, Sham and six other groups treated with immunosuppressive drugs. Animals undergoing surgery, right nephrectomy and left renal clamping, killed on the 14th day and analyzed for renal histology, urea and creatinine. RESULTS: The group receiving tacrolimus at higher doses (T3) showed renal histological lesions indicative of early nephrotoxicity, and significant increase in urea and creatinine. The group M (mycophenolate-mofetil alone) and the group M2 (mycophenolate-mofetil combined with half the usual dose of tacrolimus) presented a slight rise in serum urea. The groups using mycophenolate-mofetil alone or combined with tacrolimus showed creatinine levels similar to that of the group T3. CONCLUSIONS: Histologically, the association of injury by ischemia-reperfusion with the use of tacrolimus or mycophenolate-mofetil alone demonstrated a higher rate of renal changes typical of early nephrotoxicity. In laboratory, the combination of injury by ischemia-reperfusion with tacrolimus at higher doses proved to be nephrotoxic. .

Safety of reduced dose of mycophenolate mofetil combined with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The dose of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been reduced in Asia due to side effects associated with the conventional fixed dose of 2-3 g/day. We aimed to determine the pharmacokinetics of a reduced dose of MMF and to validate its feasibility in combination with tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). METHODS: Two sequential studies were performed in adult LDLT between October 2009 and 2011. First, we performed a prospective pharmacokinetic study in 15 recipients. We measured the area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC0-12) for mycophenolic acid at postoperative days 7 and 14, and we performed a protocol biopsy before discharge. Second, among 215 recipients, we reviewed 74 patients who were initially administered a reduced dose of MMF (1.0 g/day) with tacrolimus (trough, 8-12 ng/mL during the first month, and 5-8 ng/mL thereafter), with a 1-year follow-up. We performed protocol biopsies at 2 weeks and 1 year post-LDLT. RESULTS: In the first part of study, AUC0-12 was less than 30 mgh/L in 93.3% of cases. In the second, validating study, 41.9% of the recipients needed dose reduction or cessation due to side effects within the first year after LDLT. At 12 months post-LDLT, 17.6% of the recipients were administered a lower dose of MMF (0.5 g/day), and 16.2% needed permanent cessation due to side effects. The 1- and 12-month rejection-free survival rates were 98.6% and 97.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A reduced dose of MMF was associated with low blood levels compared to the existing recommended therapeutic range. However, reducing the dose of MMF combined with a low level of tacrolimus was feasible clinically, with an excellent short-term outcome in LDLT.

Atrofia vellositaria duodenal inducida por micofenolato mofetil: caso clínico / Duodenal villous atrophy associated with Mycophenolate mofetil: report of one case

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosupressor agent frequently used in patients after bone marrow or solid organ transplants. The most common adverse reactions of the drug are gastrointestinal, specially diarrhea and vomiting. We report a 53-year-old male, that received a heart transplant receiving immunosuppression with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Six months after the transplant, the patient started with diarrhea, anorexia and weight loss. A duodenal biopsy showed villous atrophy. Celiac disease and the presence of parasites were discarded. Mycophenolate mofetil was discontinued and one week later, diarrhea subsided. Two months later the patient was asymptomatic and recovered weight. A new duodenal biopsy showed absence of villous atrophy.

Does mycophenolate mofetil increase the risk of cytomegalovirus infection in solid organ transplant recipients? - A mini-review

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is currently used for prophylaxis of acute rejection in solid organ transplantation. There have been diverging reports regarding an association between MMF and the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. We reviewed the main published studies in an attempt to clarify the association between the use of MMF and the risk, frequency and severity of CMV infections. In a search of the Medline database with the terms "mycophenolate" and "cytomegalovir*", 42 articles were found to be relevant; among these, 29 articles were thoroughly analyzed. The first studies on MMF in renal transplantation already showed a tendency towards an association between this drug and the occurrence of CMV disease. Further studies were designed specifically to study this association; with the conclusion that an immunosuppressive regimen containing MMF increases the likelihood of CMV disease. Most studies were performed with kidney transplant recipients. We conclude that the use of MMF apparently increases the incidence of CMV disease in renal transplant patients; however, further studies are needed to confirm this association.

Terapia de rescate con micofenolato mofetil en pacientes con nefritis lúpica / Rescue therapy in lupus nephritis patients with micophenolato mofetil

La terapia a largo plazo con ciclofosfamida combinada con esteroides mejora la sobrevida renal en pacientes con Nefritis Lúpica Proliferativa, pero con efectos tóxicos considerables. En años recientes, el Micofenolato Mofetil (MMF) un inmunosupresor usado en trasplante, parece ser efectivo en casos selectos de Nefritis Lúpica. Métodos: Describiremos 6 pacientes con Nefritis Lúpica clase IV y V según OMS que por distintas razones debieron ser tratados con MMF como droga de rescate. El mismo estabilizó la función renal. Controló la actividad del LES y permitió la disminución o suspensión del corticoide. Resultados: En tres casos se logró remisión completa, dos presentaron remisión parcial y tuvimos un fracaso por plaquetopenia y leucopenia severa con sepsis grave a punto de partida de una neumopatía; en este paciente se suspendió el tratamiento. Uno de ellos presentó un herpes zóster que se trató con Aciclovir y la suspensión transitoria de MMF. Conclusión: EL MMF fue efectivo para conseguir remisiones en la NL y mantener inactivo el LES, por lo que se lo debiera considerar como terapia de rescate, o bien para tratamiento de mantenimiento luego de la inducción con ciclofosfamida, o directamente como terapia de inducción en aquellos pacientes donde la fertilidad es un factor importante. Seguimientos a largo plazo de las pacientes son necesarios para evaluar su efectividad en la sobreviva renal, como ya ha sido demostrado con la Ciclofosfamida.

Long term cyclophosfamide combinated steroids therapy improves renal survival in patients with Proliferate Lupus Nephritis, with considerable toxic effects. In lately years MMF, a immune suppressor used in transplant, seems to be effective in selected cases of Lupus Nephritis. Methods: We will describe six patients with Lupus Nephritis class IV and V (OMS Classification). that what different causes they must be treated with MMF like rescue drug. This stabilizes the renal function. controls LES activity and allows reductions or end of corticoids. Results: In tree cases we achievement total remission, two show partial remission and we had a fail because plaquetopenia and severe leucopenia with serious sepsis to give rise to neumopaty; this patient broke off the treatment. One presented Zoster...